Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Diagnostic test
Return to Contract Law Concentrate 4e Resources
Diagnostic test
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
According to the Court of Appeal in
Pharmaceutical Society of GB
v
Boots
[1953] 1 QB 401, which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
describes the normal process of contract formation in a self-service shop?
The display of goods is an offer and the customer accepts that offer by placing the goods into the shopping basket/trolley.
correct
incorrect
The customer makes an offer by placing the goods into their shopping basket/trolley and the cashier accepts that offer by ringing up the price of the goods on the cash register (or passing the goods over the barcode reader).
correct
incorrect
The customer makes an offer by taking the goods to the checkout and the cashier accepts that offer by ringing them up on the cash register.
correct
incorrect
The display of goods is an offer and the customer accepts that offer when they take the goods to the checkout.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which
one
of the following circumstances is the acceptance ineffective because it does
not
comply with the prescribed method of acceptance in the offer?
The offeree uses an equally efficacious method of acceptance as that prescribed in the offer.
correct
incorrect
The offeree uses a method of acceptance that is more advantageous to the offeror than the prescribed method of acceptance in the offer.
correct
incorrect
The offeror makes it clear that the prescribed method of acceptance is the only and mandatory method.
correct
incorrect
The offeree knows that the offeror prefers the prescribed method of acceptance.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A offers to sell her car to B for £2,000. B replies: 'Can I pick it up tomorrow by any chance?' A responds: 'If you pay by cheque, then it must be cleared by my bank before you can drive the car away, but if you pay by cash, you can pick up the car immediately if you wish.' B replies: 'I accept your very generous offer. I'll pay by cheque but I need to collect the car immediately.' The next morning, B sends another message to A: 'OK. I can pay by cash.' B turns up to pay that afternoon, but A then refuses to sell her car to B because she has received a better offer from C. Which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
describes the legal position between A and B?
B's first response is a counter-offer, which destroys A's original offer. No contract can therefore take place.
correct
incorrect
B's first response is a request for information but no contract can take place because B's second response is a counter-offer, which destroys A's original offer, and this counter-offer is never accepted by A.
correct
incorrect
Both of B's first two responses are requests for information and a contract is made when B's third response is communicated to A accepting A's offer.
correct
incorrect
There is a contract between A and B because A has failed to respond to B's last message expeditiously and B has relied upon A's silence by turning up to pay.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A sends an email to B offering to sell her Ford Focus car to B for £5,000 and clearly states that the offer will be open for a week. On the fifth day, A receives an offer from C to buy the same car for £5,500. A then emails B to say that she now wants £5,500 for the car. On the sixth day, B replies to A's second email purporting to accept the original offer of £5,000. Which
one
of the following statements is
true
?
There is no contract between A and B because A's second email has revoked the original offer to sell the car for £5,000.
correct
incorrect
There is a contract between A and B because A's second email is not an express revocation of the original offer and B can pick one of the two offers to accept.
correct
incorrect
There is a contract between A and B because A clearly states that the original offer is open for a week and thus cannot revoke it before that period expires.
correct
incorrect
There is a contract between A and B because B replies to A's second email and B's reply must be taken as an acceptance of A's second offer of £5,500.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A, presenting herself as a well-known figure, C, reaches a contract with B over the telephone. B believes that he is contracting with C. When B later discovers the fraud, he claims that the contract is void for his mistake as to the other party's identity but he is unsure which legal authority he should cite. Which
one
of the following pieces of advice given to B is
true
?
According to
Cundy v Lindsay
(1878) 3 App Cas 459, the contract is void because A's identity is crucially important and B only intends to deal with C.
correct
incorrect
According to
Lewis
v
Averay
[1972] 1 QB 198, the contract is not void, because B intended to deal with the person at the other end of the line (A).
correct
incorrect
According to
Shogun Finance
v
Hudson
[2003] UKHL 62, [2004] 1 AC 919, the contract is void because B intended to deal only with the person identified in the telephone conversations (C).
correct
incorrect
According to
King's Norton Metal Co Ltd
v
Edridge, Merrett & Co
(1897) 14 TLR 98, the contract is not void, because B intended to deal with the person at the other end of the line (A).
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Where an inessential term of the contract suffers from vagueness, it may be possible to sever that term and enforce the rest of the contract.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A 'lockout' agreement, preventing a party from negotiating with any third party, even if no time limit is specified for those negotiations, is likely to be upheld by a court as enforceable due to the courts placing an implied duty on a party who had agreed to the lockout to negotiate in good faith with the party to that lockout for a reasonable period of time.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In both
Scammell & Nephew Ltd
v
Ouston
[1941] AC 251 and
British Steel Corp
v
Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co
[1984] 1 All ER 504, the contract was held to be void because the parties in both cases had failed to agree upon several essential aspects of the contract.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A employs B as a consultant in her firm. B is paid £15,000 plus a 'discretionary bonus'. Over the past year, A's firm has doubled its profits and therefore A decides to pay an additional £8,000 to B for 'all of your help and hard work throughout the past year'. B is delighted and buys a new car in anticipation of the extra money being given to him. Subsequently, A changes her mind and refuses to pay the extra £8,000 to B. Which
one
of the following statements
most
accurately
summarises the legal position?
A is estopped from changing her mind but she can, on giving reasonable notice, return to the original contract and rely on the fixed annual salary clause.
correct
incorrect
A's promise is unclear and therefore unenforceable.
correct
incorrect
B has not provided valid consideration for the additional £8,000 because the promise refers exclusively to his performance over the past year, which amounts to a 'past consideration' only.
correct
incorrect
B can claim the extra £8,000 because he was carrying out A's instructions over the past year and it was reasonable for him to have expected this extra payment in the light of the 'discretionary bonus' clause in his contract.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which
one
of the following situations is the promise in question
unlikely
to be supported by a valid consideration?
On 1 February, A enters into a contract with B by which B is to complete certain building work on A's premises in return for a payment of £10,000. The parties agree the work must be completed by 1 May, in time for A's grand opening of her new shop. Four weeks prior to the agreed completion date, B realises it is unlikely to complete the work on time and so A promises an extra £1,000 to enable B to source additional labour. B completes the work on time, but A refuses to pay the additional £1,000.
correct
incorrect
B owes £500 to A. A agrees to accept a horse belonging to B in full satisfaction of the debt. B delivers the horse to A.
correct
incorrect
B employs A to carry out decoration work. Whilst carrying out the work, A realises that he is short of money and therefore asks B for an increase in the contract price. B agrees to pay an extra £5,000 provided A completes his work a day earlier than originally agreed. A completes his work a day earlier than originally agreed.
correct
incorrect
B owes a debt of £2,000 to be payable to A on 1 June. B has encountered some financial difficulties and asks A if A will instead accept £1,800 on 1 June. A agrees to accept £1,800 and payment is made. A then changes her mind and demands the balance from B.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A contacts B, a friend, by telephone and asks him out to lunch adding that she (A) will pay. B agrees to meet A, saying that he (B) will pay for the wine. B arrives at the agreed restaurant the next day but A telephones to say that she must cancel the arrangement because of an urgent business meeting. B, who is a self-employed financial consultant, has taken a day off work for the lunch and, because he has lost a day's earnings as a consequence of A's cancellation, he seeks some redress (even if this is simply payment for his meal). Which
one
of these statements
most accurately
summarises the legal position?
A and B have a contract because both parties furnish valid consideration.
correct
incorrect
Because A and B are businesspeople, there is a presumption of intention to create legal relations in this contract and so it is a binding contract.
correct
incorrect
There is a presumption that legal relations are not intended in social agreements of this nature.
correct
incorrect
A is estopped from refusing to pay for B's meal.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A is B's landlord. A offers to reduce the rent to B for six months because B is in financial difficulties. B is very pleased and pays the reduced rent for two months. At this point, A demands full payment of rent for those two months because B has won a large amount of money on the National Lottery. Which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
summarises the legal position between A and B?
B must pay A the full rent for all six months because the reason for reducing the rent no longer exists.
correct
incorrect
B has provided sufficient consideration for A's promise to reduce the rent and is therefore entitled to refuse A's request.
correct
incorrect
A is estopped from going back on his words and is bound to accept the reduced rent until completion of the six months.
correct
incorrect
A can return to the original contract and claim full rent for the future after a reasonable period following the demand, but is unable to recover the extra rent for any time before that period elapses.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
To enforce a contract according to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, a third party must show that it has provided consideration under the contract.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 preserves the promisee's right to enforce the promise but requires the promisee to pass any damages recovered from the promisor to the third party beneficiary.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which
one
of the following statements relating to the hypothetical applicability of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to the facts of
New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd
v
A M Satterthwaite & Co Ltd, The Eurymedon
[1975] AC 154 is
true
?
The 1999 Act would have been applicable to
The Eurymedon
because the Himalaya clause expressly gave the stevedore the right to enforce the clause.
correct
incorrect
The 1999 Act would have been applicable to
The Eurymedon
because the Himalaya clause purported to confer a benefit on the stevedore and there was no indication in the contract that the parties did not intend the clause to be enforced by the stevedore.
correct
incorrect
The 1999 Act would not have been applicable to
The Eurymedon
because the stevedore was not employed by the carriers at the time the contract was made.
correct
incorrect
The 1999 Act would not have been applicable to
The Eurymedon
because the stevedore did not provide any consideration for the Himalaya clause.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
To enforce a term under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, the third party must, according to the test of enforceability in s. 1, be expressly identified in the contract by name, as a member of a class or as answering a particular description but need not be in existence when the contract is entered into.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
On 1 June, A contracts to sell a quantity of goods to B to be delivered by 1 July. On 15 June, as A is still making arrangements for the shipment of the goods, he receives a fax message from B stating that the goods are no longer wanted. Which
one
of the following statements concerning A's rights is
true
?
A is not entitled to terminate the contract or to claim damages until 1 July.
correct
incorrect
A is entitled to claim damages immediately but is not entitled to terminate the contract until 1 July.
correct
incorrect
A is entitled to terminate the contract and claim damages immediately.
correct
incorrect
A is entitled to terminate the contract immediately but is not entitled to claim damages until 1 July.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A Ltd enters a contract with B Ltd, under which B Ltd is to develop a software product specifically tailored for A Ltd for a fixed price. Before B Ltd starts the development or incurs any expense under the contract, A Ltd cancels the contract, alleging a fundamental change of its business strategy. B Ltd ignores A Ltd's cancellation and continues to complete the development of the software. Supposing the performance of the contract will not enhance B Ltd's reputation, which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
summarise the legal position between the parties?
B Ltd is entitled to the contract price because it may freely decide whether to terminate or to affirm the contract following A Ltd's anticipatory breach.
correct
incorrect
B Ltd is not bound to terminate the contract following A Ltd's anticipatory breach because B Ltd has a legitimate interest in affirming the contract and continuing its performance.
correct
incorrect
B Ltd is not entitled to the contract price because it cannot complete its performance of the contract without the cooperation of A Ltd.
correct
incorrect
B Ltd is entitled to the contract price because its performance of the contract does not require the cooperation of A Ltd.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Where a statement made by one party before the conclusion of the contract is found to be untrue, the innocent party's remedies may vary according to whether the statement is characterized as a term or a representation. If the statement is characterized as a term, which
one
of the following assertions relating to the innocent party's remedies is
true
?
The innocent party may terminate the contract.
correct
incorrect
The innocent party is not entitled to claim damages unless it proves the misstating party's fault.
correct
incorrect
The innocent party is generally entitled to damages for expectation losses.
correct
incorrect
The innocent party may recover all those losses that are directly caused by the misstating party.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The party seeking to challenge the effectiveness of an exemption clause has the burden of establishing that the clause has not been incorporated into the contract and does not cover the other (breaching) party's liability in issue.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A was travelling abroad for business purposes and hired a car from B company. The contract of hire exempted B from liability for 'any losses or damage suffered by the hirers, whether caused by our company's neglect or fault or not'. At the time of contracting, A made it clear that he wanted to leave his personal belongings in the car from time to time and B expressed no objection. When A parked the car outside a cinema, his personal belongings left in the car were stolen. It was discovered that this was solely attributed to the negligence of one of B's staff, who failed to repair the defective back door of the car. One of the legal questions arising from this case was whether the exemption clause covered B's negligence liability for the lost property. Which
one
of the following statements is probably
true
in respect of this legal question?
The clause did not cover B's negligence liability, because the word 'negligence' was not used.
correct
incorrect
The clause did cover B's negligence liability because the words used in that clause were wide enough to cover such liability.
correct
incorrect
The clause did cover B's negligence liability because the word 'neglect' used in that clause was a synonym of negligence.
correct
incorrect
The clause did not cover B's liability for negligence, because negligence was not the only ground of B's liability for the lost property.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 subjects every contract term falling within its scope to a reasonableness test.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In applying the reasonableness test under s.11 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 to determine whether the term is a fair and reasonable one to have included, the courts make a broad assessment of the parties' relationship, considering factors such as the circumstances known to the parties at the time of contracting, as well as all relevant events subsequent to the contract's formation and the effect of those events on each party.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The purpose of awarding contractual damages is generally to put the non-breaching party into the position it would have been in had the contract been performed as agreed.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A agrees to repair B's broken mill shaft and to return it to B within a week. At the time of contracting, B points out that he has no spare mill shaft and that he will not be able to operate his mill until the repaired one has been returned. A does not return the repaired shaft until two weeks later. B sues A for breach of contract, claiming damages for the loss of profit during the second week, when his mill was closed as a result of A's delay. A argues that the damages claimed by B are too remote to be recoverable. Which
one
of the following statements concerning A's argument is
true
?
The damages claimed by B are not too remote, because his loss of profit is a natural or normal loss resulting from A's breach of contract.
correct
incorrect
The damages claimed by B are too remote, because his loss of profit is an abnormal loss resulting from A's breach of contract.
correct
incorrect
The damages claimed by B are too remote, because his loss of profit is not within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of contracting.
correct
incorrect
The damages claimed by B are not too remote, because his loss of profit is an abnormal loss within the parties' actual knowledge at the time of contracting.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A, the owner of a vessel, enters into an agreement with a charterer, B, for the charter of the vessel. A spends money preparing the vessel before B subsequently, in breach of contract, repudiates the agreement. However, A is then immediately able to enter into a new agreement with another charterer, C, and due to an upturn in the market rate, receives a much greater profit than that which she would have received under the agreement with B.
Regardless of the greater profit received, A will always be entitled to recover the wasted expenditure in reliance on the agreement with B.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
Makdessi
v
Cavendish Square Holding BV
[2015] UKSC 67, [2015] 3 WLR 1373, the Supreme Court stated that the scope of the penalty rule applies in circumstances concerning agreed damages clauses that are payable on breach and is not concerned with payments concerning primary contractual obligations.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A enters into two similar contracts with C and D to import certain machinery. The importation of the machinery requires a licence from the government of A's country. In the contract with C, A guarantees to obtain a licence, whilst no such guarantee is given in the contract with D. A applies for two licences for the importation of the machinery but only one licence is granted. A allocates the licence to the contract with C and claims that the contract with D is frustrated. Which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
summarises the legal position between A and D?
The contract has not been frustrated, because the unavailability of the licence is not due to any breach of contract by A.
correct
incorrect
The contract has been frustrated, because the allocation by A of the only licence to the other contract aims to avoid a breach of that contract by A and is thus reasonable.
correct
incorrect
The contract has not been frustrated, because the unavailability of licence is due to A's allocation of the only licence to the other contract.
correct
incorrect
The contract has been frustrated, because the contract has not expressly allocated the risk of failure to obtain the licence to A.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which
one
of the following statements concerning the decision of the House of Lords in
Bell
v
Lever Brothers Ltd
[1932] AC 161 is
true
?
The House laid down a more relaxed test of 'essential difference' than the test of impossibility.
correct
incorrect
The House laid down a test of 'essential difference' and construed it very narrowly.
correct
incorrect
The case related to a common mistake as to ownership (
res sua
).
correct
incorrect
The case had nothing to do with common mistake as to the quality of the subject matter.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A owns a tanker that has suffered a massive engine explosion. A finds out from an independent source that a ship owned by B is the closest vessel to the stricken tanker. B agrees to divert his vessel in order to render assistance to the crew of A's tanker, provided A will agree to a minimum hire charge of £50,000, 'irrespective of whether B's vessel is used or not'. A accepts B's offer but finds out within minutes that his tanker has already sunk with the loss of all hands. Which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
represents the legal position of A?
A is not bound to pay any hire charge because the contract is probably void for common mistake.
correct
incorrect
A is not bound to pay any hire charge because the contract is voidable for common mistake.
correct
incorrect
A is not bound to pay the hire charge because A's obligations under the contract are subject to an implied condition precedent that A's tanker was afloat at the time when A and B entered into the contract.
correct
incorrect
A is probably bound to pay the hire charge because the contract has allocated to A the risk of the tanker sinking.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which
one
of the following statements is inconsistent with the decision in
Couturier
v
Hastie
(1856) 5 HL 673?
This case concerned a contract for the sale of specific goods.
correct
incorrect
The decision might also be explained by the doctrine of frustration because the cargo was resold after it had been shipped.
correct
incorrect
The seller's claim for the contract price was rejected on the ground that the contract was void because of common mistake.
correct
incorrect
Had the buyer brought an action for damages, the seller might have been liable for breach of contract.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which
one
of the following principles was recognised and applied by the Court of Appeal in
Edgington
v
Fitzmaurice
(1885) 24 ChD 459?
In order to be actionable, a misrepresentation must be the only factor to have contributed to the decision to enter into the contract.
correct
incorrect
A false statement of a present intention cannot be a misstatement of fact.
correct
incorrect
A fraudulent misrepresentation induces a contract, even if it is not the only factor to have contributed to the decision to enter into the contract.
correct
incorrect
A misstatement of intention does not amount to an actionable misrepresentation.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which
one
of the following statements is
incorrect
in relation to the advantages for a party in bringing a claim alleging negligent misrepresentation under s. 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 rather than at common law?
Under s. 2(1), the misrepresentee does not have to prove the existence of a special relationship between him and the misrepresentor.
correct
incorrect
Under s. 2(1), the misrepresentor has the burden to disprove negligence and this burden is not to be discharged lightly.
correct
incorrect
Under s. 2(1), the misrepresentee is entitled to claim expectation damages.
correct
incorrect
Under s. 2(1), the misrepresentee is entitled to all of the losses directly caused by the misrepresentation, even if the losses are not reasonably foreseeable at the time of the misrepresentation.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A is considering buying B's house as an investment. By a fraudulent misrepresentation, B induces A to buy his house for £180,000 although its actual value is only £120,000. When A discovers the fraud two weeks later, the value of the house has been reduced to £80,000 due to serious damage caused by the collapse of a supporting wall. At this point, a buyer offers £80,000 for the house. A does not sell the house until three months later, when A only gets £75,000 for the house because of a general fall of the property market. A rescinds the contract with B for fraudulent misrepresentation and claims damages. Which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
calculates the damages to which A is entitled?
A is entitled to £60,000 in damages because this represents the difference in value between the amount paid and the actual value of the house at the date of the contract.
correct
incorrect
A is entitled to £100,000 in damages because this is the only loss caused by B's misrepresentation.
correct
incorrect
A is entitled to £105,000 damages because this would put A into the position before the misrepresentation was made.
correct
incorrect
A is entitled to £180,000 damages because, upon rescission of the contract, the parties would be restored to their positions before the contract was made.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A presumption of undue influence arises once it is shown that the relationship between two parties falls within certain recognised relationships or, on the facts, constitutes a relationship of trust and confidence.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which
one
of the following relationships is it
not
possible to disapprove the existence of trust and confidence between the parties by contrary evidence?
The relationship between an unmarried couple.
correct
incorrect
The relationship between solicitor and client.
correct
incorrect
The relationship between army and soldier.
correct
incorrect
The relationship between bank and customer.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
According to
Royal Bank of Scotland plc
v
Etridge (No. 2)
[2002] UKHL 44, [2002] 2 AC 773, there is no longer a requirement to establish manifest disadvantage. Instead, the emphasis is on whether the nature and size of the transaction (contract) can be readily explained by the parties' relationship or calls for some explanation because it raises suspicion.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
If, in making a contractual agreement, one party has taken advantage of a relationship existing between the parties, the doctrine of undue influence might render the agreement voidable (liable to be set aside).
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A married couple live in a house owned by the wife and jointly own a family business. The husband persuades the wife to use the house as security to obtain loans from M Bank. In the loan application form, it is stated that the loan will be used for the purpose of the family business. A manager of M Bank interviews the couple in a branch of M Bank and is informed, during the interview, of their relationship and of the fact that the husband is responsible for the operation of the family business and that the wife has no active role. The manager then asks if the wife has received any independent advice on the application. The wife replies that she has a solicitor and will consult her about it. The wife then forgets to consult her solicitor. The next week, the application is approved and the wife and the manager sign a contract using the house as security of the loan. Five months later, the family business fails due to poor management and the couple is unable to repay the loan. M Bank then claims the wife's house. It has been established that the husband has unduly influenced the wife's decision to enter the security contract. Which
one
of the following statements
most accurately
summarises the legal positions of the parties?
M Bank is entitled to claim the house because M Bank has not unduly influenced the wife's decision to enter into the security contract.
correct
incorrect
M Bank is entitled to claim the house because it has not been put on inquiry since the application form stated that the loan was to be used for the family business partly owned by the wife. The security contract was thus to the advantage of the wife.
correct
incorrect
M Bank is not entitled to claim the house because it has not taken reasonable steps to ensure that the wife entered the security contract freely and with the knowledge of the implications of the transaction.
correct
incorrect
M Bank is not entitled to claim the house because it has been put on inquiry because the couple informed the manager during the interview that the wife had no active role in the family business.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
According to
Royal Bank of Scotland plc
v
Etridge (No. 2)
[2002] UKHL 44, [2002] 2 AC 773, there is no longer a requirement to establish manifest disadvantage. Instead, the emphasis is on whether the nature and size of the transaction (contract) can be readily explained by the parties' relationship or calls for some explanation because it raises suspicion.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Exit Quiz
Next Question
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Reset
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country