Alvin Plantinga: Religious Belief without Evidence

Quiz Content

not completed
Plantinga argues that belief in God is

not completed
According to Plantinga, the two premises of the evidentialist objection to belief in God are (i) that it is irrational or unreasonable to accept theistic belief without sufficient evidence and that (ii)

not completed
Plantinga argues that the evidentialist objection to theistic belief is typically rooted in

not completed
In the right circumstances, according to Plantinga, a properly basic belief could be

Back to top