* not completed

. Which deception offences were abolished by the Fraud Act 2006?

Dishonestly obtaining property belonging to another by deception under s. 15 Theft Act 1968. correct incorrect

Dishonestly obtaining services by deception under s. 1 Theft Act 1978. correct incorrect

All of the offences defined by way of deception in the Theft Acts 1968 and 1978. correct incorrect

Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it under s. 1 Theft Act 1968. correct incorrect

* not completed

. In Harris (1975), D was convicted of attempting to obtain a pecuniary advantage by deception when he checked into a hotel under a false name. Which offence, if any, is it likely he could be convicted of under the Fraud Act 2006?

None correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 2 correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 3 correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 4 correct incorrect

* not completed

. In Gilmartin (1983), D was convicted of obtaining property by deception when he obtained goods in exchange for cheques drawn against an account he knew to be overdrawn, knowing it likely the cheques would not be honoured. Which offence, if any, is it likely he could be convicted of under the Fraud Act 2006?

None correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 2 correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 3 correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 4 correct incorrect

* not completed

. In Firth (1990), D was convicted of obtaining the evasion of a liability deception when he failed to disclose to the hospital in which he worked that some of the patients he had treated were private rather than NHS patients. Which offence(s) might he be convicted of under the Fraud Act 2006?

Section 1 by breach of s. 2 in that he made a false representation by his conduct. correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 3 in that he had a legal duty to disclose the status of his patients. correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 4 as he was in a position where he was expected to safeguard the hospital's financial interests. correct incorrect

All of the above. correct incorrect

* not completed

. In Gomez (1993), the authority on the meaning of appropriation for the purposes of theft, D deceived his manager at work into authorizing the sale of the goods to a third party in exchange for stolen cheques. Which offence(s) might he be convicted of under the Fraud Act 2006?

Section 1 by breach of s. 2 in that he made a false representation. correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 3 in that he had a legal duty to disclose the cheques were stolen. correct incorrect

Section 1 by breach of s. 4 as he was in a position where he was expected to safeguard his employer's financial interests. correct incorrect

All of the above. correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following terms IS defined in the Fraud Act 2006?

False (representation, s. 2) correct incorrect

Misleading (s. 2) correct incorrect

Legal duty (to disclose, s. 3) correct incorrect

Expected to safeguard (the financial interests of another, s. 4) correct incorrect

* not completed

. What offence is governed by s. 11 of the Fraud Act 2006?

Dishonestly obtaining services by deception. correct incorrect

Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. correct incorrect

Dishonestly obtaining services. correct incorrect

Dishonestly appropriating services. correct incorrect

* not completed

. How is dishonesty assessed for the purposes of fraud contrary to s. 1 of the Fraud Act 2006?

Section 2(1) Theft Act 1968 correct incorrect

The Ghosh test correct incorrect

Both correct incorrect

Neither correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following elements has to be proved by the prosecution for D to be convicted of conspiracy to defraud?

A deception. correct incorrect

Economic loss to the victim. correct incorrect

That it was the defendants' purpose to defraud the victim. correct incorrect

That the defendants made an agreement to deprive the victim of something which was his or to which he was entitled, or to injure a proprietary right of his. correct incorrect